打架成本警示牌

股票带帽与摘帽：新规逻辑、真实细节与市场误区_我的网站

浪漫满屋

一 | ST、*ST带帽不是简单的市场警示标签，是监管对上市公司经营、治理、财务合规性的分层定性。摘帽也不等于企业彻底反转，只是阶段性风险解除。 New Delhi, Oct, 20 (UNI) A Delhi Special Court fixed October, 31 for hearing arguments on the bail application in the matter registered under the provisions of Prevention Money Laundering Act against Delhi's Health Minister Satyendar.

Special Judge Vikash Dhull after hearing arguments in the bail application on behalf of Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain said, " Put up the matter on 27.10.2022 for hearing arguments on the bail application of Satyendar Jain."

Counsel for Jain submitted before the Court that main counsel Sh. N. Hariharan who is to argue the bail application on behalf of Jain has to go for some medical checkup and will not be available before 31.10.2022.

After hearing the request on behalf of Jain the Court said, "Put up on 31.10.2022 for arguments on the bail application of accused Satyendar Kumar Jain. Superintendent, Tihar Jail is directed to produce accused Satyendar Kumar Jain, Vaibhav Jain and Ankush Jain through video conferencing on 31.10.2022"

The Principal District & Sessions Court of Rouse Avenue, New Delhi on September, 22 transfer the matter registered under the provisions of Prevention Money Laundering Act against Delhi's Health Minister Satyendar Jain from the Court of Special Judge Geetanjali Goel's to Special Judge Vikash Dhull. Jain challenged the order of transfer in High Court and Apex Court and later on withdraw the same from Apex Court. Now the matter is at the stage of hearing arguments on bail application of Jain.

Government Counsel for ED opposed the bail application by submitting that Jain served as a Health Minister in Delhi may managed to get forged documents and can influence the doctors and Jail official.

ED has earlier opposed the bail application of Satyendar Jain by submitting that if bail granted he may influence the co-accused, witnesses and other documents related to the case.

Counsel for Jain opposed the submission of ED by submitting that this is a malafide application to derail the trial and to prolong the custody of Jain. He contented that Jain is neither a Health Minister nor Jail Minister but is in jail and because the hospital where Jain was admitted under the control of Delhi Government is no ground to alleged a bias in the case.

Investigating Agency has arrested Satyendar Jain in this Matter on May, 30 under the provisions of PMLA and he is now in the judicial custody at Tihar.

Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in its chargesheet has alleged amassing assets to the tune of Rs. 1.47 crore in Disproportionate Assets case while Enforcement Directorate has submitted the attachment of Rs. 4.81 crore in connection with money laundering investigation.

UNI XC GNK。多数投资者将带帽等同于绝对利空、摘帽等同于确定性利好，这种单一判断会忽略规则差异与企业真实质地，造成跟风踩坑或过早离场。市场两类风险警示标签，底层风险等级完全不同。ST属于其他风险警示，多源于公司治理瑕疵，不触及退市底线。常见诱因包括违规担保、股东资金占用、内控缺陷、持续经营存疑等问题，整体风险可...。